Ruble v. Coulter
This text of 63 Ill. App. 484 (Ruble v. Coulter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion oe the Court.
The assignment of the contract of the Cold Blast Feather Company to S. P. Ruble, was to indemnify him for signing a note for $750. It appears that he has received from the Cold Blast Feather Company by reason of such assignment, $1,334.09.
As the assignment was to be at an end and the rights of the assignor to be resumed when the assignor paid said note, the jury were warranted in finding that the assignment, when such payment of $1,334.09 had been made, was at an end, and consequently, against the claim of the assignee, interpleader, to anything further from said Cold Blast Feather Company.
The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Ill. App. 484, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruble-v-coulter-illappct-1896.