Rubio v. D'Elia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rubio v. D'Elia

106 A.D.2d 387, 482 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21417

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 A.D.2d 387 (Rubio v. D'Elia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rubio v. D'Elia, 106 A.D.2d 387, 482 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services which, after a statutory fair hearing, confirmed a determination of the Nassau County Department of Social Services finding that one Georgina Calderon was ineligible for medical assistance, petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated July 12, 1982, as granted the cross motions of the respondents to dismiss the petition.

Order and judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceeding converted into a plenary action by the Community Hospital at Glen Cove, as plaintiff, against the Nassau County Department of Social Services, as defendant, and, as such the action is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith. The action is dismissed as to the respondent State Commissioner. The Community Hospital at Glen Cove is granted leave to serve an amended complaint and its time to do so is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Special Term correctly found that neither Maria Rubio nor Community Hospital at Glen Cove had standing to pursue the administrative process in connection with the application for medical assistance on Georgina Calderon’s behalf (see Matter of North Shore Univ. Hosp. v D’Elia, 71 AD2d 991). However, the petitioner medical services provider is entitled to bring a plenary action in its own right agrinst the government agency designated to declare ineligibility (see New York Hosp. v Krauskopf, 98 AD2d 667; Calvary Hosp. v D’Elia, 95 AD2d 817; Matter of North Shore Univ. Hosp. v. D’Elia, supra). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services which, after a statutory fair hearing, confirmed a determination of the Nassau County Department of Social Services finding that one Georgina Calderon was ineligible for medical assistance, petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated July 12, 1982, as granted the cross motions of the respondents to dismiss the petition.

Order and judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceeding converted into a plenary action by the Community Hospital at Glen Cove, as plaintiff, against the Nassau County Department of Social Services, as defendant, and, as such the action is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith. The action is dismissed as to the respondent State Commissioner. The Community Hospital at Glen Cove is granted leave to serve an amended complaint and its time to do so is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Special Term correctly found that neither Maria Rubio nor Community Hospital at Glen Cove had standing to pursue the administrative process in connection with the application for medical assistance on Georgina Calderon’s behalf (see Matter of North Shore Univ. Hosp. v D’Elia, 71 AD2d 991). However, the petitioner medical services provider is entitled to bring a plenary action in its own right agrinst the government agency designated to declare ineligibility (see New York Hosp. v Krauskopf, 98 AD2d 667; Calvary Hosp. v D’Elia, 95 AD2d 817; Matter of North Shore Univ. Hosp. v. D’Elia, supra). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 387, 482 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubio-v-delia-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack