Rubio v. Allison
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ROBERT LOUIS RUBIO, 8 Case No. 21-cv-00921-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 10 PREJUDICE KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., 11 Defendants. 12
13 On July 26, 2021, the Court issued an Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend. 14 Specifically, the Court granted Plaintiff twenty-eight days from the date of the Order to file an 15 amended complaint to allege facts sufficient to state a cognizable constitutional claim. Plaintiff 16 was warned that the failure to timely file an amended complaint would result in the dismissal of 17 this action for failure to prosecute. The time for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has 18 passed, and no amended complaint has been filed. Taking into account the salient factors set forth 19 in Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), the Court finds that dismissal is 20 warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).1 See Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 21 983, 989, 992 (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal of action following plaintiff’s failure to amend 22 complaint after receiving leave to do so, where the interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, 23 the court’s management of its docket, and avoiding prejudice to defendants favored dismissal). 24 1 If and when Plaintiff is prepared to pursue his claims, he may file a new civil rights 25 action. The limitations period to file a section 1983 action in California is two years, but it is tolled for up to two years during a continuous period of incarceration. See Silva v. Crain, 169 F. 26 3d 608, 610 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding, pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340(3), that the limitations period for filing a section 1983 action in California is one year); S.B. 688 (amending 27 Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340(3) and adding section 335.1 to establish two-year residual limitations 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint in the above-captioned action 2 || is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: September 16, 2021 5 DGE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12
© 15 16
= 17
Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rubio v. Allison (Rubio v. Allison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.