Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania Railroad of New Jersey

11 A.D.2d 762, 205 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8623

This text of 11 A.D.2d 762 (Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania Railroad of New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania Railroad of New Jersey, 11 A.D.2d 762, 205 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Motion for reargument is granted and the order of June 7,1960 (ante, p. 640) of this court is vacated. Upon reargument the judgment appealed from is unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of ordering a new trial as to all defendants except the defendant Cantor and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, -with costs to appellants as against plaintiffs-respondents and with costs to defendant-respondent Cantor as against defendant Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.2d 762, 205 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubinstein-v-pennsylvania-railroad-of-new-jersey-nyappdiv-1960.