Rubinstein v. Kasprzak
124 A. 365, 96 N.J. Eq. 406, 11 Stock. 406, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 433
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, KAYS — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rubinstein v. Kasprzak, 124 A. 365, 96 N.J. Eq. 406, 11 Stock. 406, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 433 (N.J. 1924).
124 A. 365 (Rubinstein v. Kasprzak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donadt v. Eberle
27 A.2d 612 (U.S. District Court, 1942)
Brown v. Comer
1 A.2d 470 (Atlantic County Circuit Court, N.J., 1938)
Lubin v. Rosenthal
187 A. 559 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)
Goldberg v. Fisher
168 A. 232 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)