Rubinstein v. Jamaica National Bank of New York

62 N.E.2d 394, 294 N.Y. 843, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 1032
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rubinstein v. Jamaica National Bank of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 N.Y. 727
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 24, 1945·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended so as to add after the word costs ” the words “ to the defendant-respondent, The Jamaica National Bank of New York.” [See 294 N. Y. 727.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rubinstein v. Jamaica National Bank of New York, 62 N.E.2d 394, 294 N.Y. 843, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 1032 (N.Y. 1945).

62 N.E.2d 394 (Rubinstein v. Jamaica National Bank of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubinstein v. Jamaica National Bank of New York
61 N.E.2d 455 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)