Rubinow v. Public Service Railway Co.
94 A. 54, 87 N.J.L. 328, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 227
Opinion
The court being equally divided, in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.
For affirmmce—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Yredenburgh, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 8.
For reversal—Garrison, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Bogert, White, JJ. 8.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rubinow v. Public Service Railway Co., 94 A. 54, 87 N.J.L. 328, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 227 (N.J. 1915).
94 A. 54 (Rubinow v. Public Service Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.