Rubinow v. Public Service Railway Co.
94 A. 54, 87 N.J.L. 328, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 227
This text of 94 A. 54 (Rubinow v. Public Service Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rubinow v. Public Service Railway Co., 94 A. 54, 87 N.J.L. 328, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 227 (N.J. 1915).
Opinion
The court being equally divided, in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.
For affirmmce—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Yredenburgh, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 8.
For reversal—Garrison, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Bogert, White, JJ. 8.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 A. 54, 87 N.J.L. 328, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubinow-v-public-service-railway-co-nj-1915.