Rubin v. Yedlin

224 A.D. 768
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1928·No. Appeals Nos. 1 and 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order granting motion for injunction pendente lite reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiffs, having asked equitable relief, must come with clean hands, and having defrauded defendants, they are barred from such relief. Plaintiffs’ appeal for relief offends the conscience of this court. (Unckles v. Colgate, 148 N. Y. 529.) Order denying motion to dismiss complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The complaint purports to allege an action in equity and prays for an injunction. It shows upon its face that the judgment for $3,000 was based upon the fraudulent acts of these plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have not come into court with clean hands. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rubin v. Yedlin, 224 A.D. 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

224 A.D. 768 (Rubin v. Yedlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duggan v. Platz
238 A.D. 197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)