Rubin v. Rubin
774 So. 2d 778, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16200, 2000 WL 1816640
Opinion
We affirm the order appealed in all respects, except one. We reverse that portion of the order finding E.S. Rubin in contempt because the trial court failed to [779] make a specific finding that the former husband’s conduct was willful. See Washburn v. Washburn, 647 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rubin v. Rubin, 774 So. 2d 778, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16200, 2000 WL 1816640 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
774 So. 2d 778 (Rubin v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washburn v. Washburn
647 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)