Rubin v. New Sunrise Investment Corp.

596 So. 2d 1099, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2312
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 1992·No. Nos. 90-2197, 90-2198 and 90-2895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hynd v. Ireland, 582 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Steigman v. Danese, 502 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 998 (Fla.1987); Tullo v. Horner, 296 So.2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 95.031(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rubin v. New Sunrise Investment Corp., 596 So. 2d 1099, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 1099 (Rubin v. New Sunrise Investment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. State
596 So. 2d 1099 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)