Rubin v. Joseph
This text of 211 A.D. 871 (Rubin v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Plaintiffs, upon the trial, relied entirely upon the interlocutory judgment in the annulment suit to prove the physical incapacity of the defendant. The final judgment had in fact not then been entered, and the interlocutory judgment was not res adjudicata against the defendant upon this question. (Brown v. Cleveland Trust Co., 233 N. Y. 399, 405; Petit v. Petit, 45 Misc. 155.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 A.D. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubin-v-joseph-nyappdiv-1924.