Rubin v. Harnett

New York Court of Appeals

Rubin v. Harnett

383 N.E.2d 114, 45 N.Y.2d 886, 410 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2310

DecidedOctober 24, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 383 N.E.2d 114 (Rubin v. Harnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rubin v. Harnett, 383 N.E.2d 114, 45 N.Y.2d 886, 410 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2310 (N.Y. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

[888]*888OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the reasoning of the Appellate Division in its memorandum. In addition, we would note that the amendment to section 255 of the Insurance Law (L 1970, ch 572, now Insurance Law, § 255, subd 2-a, par [d]), following our decision in Matter of Procaccino v Stewart (25 NY2d 301, 305) removes any doubt that the requirements of section 2807 of the Public Health Law and section 255 of the Insurance Law are not necessarily dependent.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI