Rubin Bros. Waste Co. v. United States
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the one bale of wool rags reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest is sustained .to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
32 Cust. Ct. 445 (Rubin Bros. Waste Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.