Rubertus v. Schwan's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Rubertus v. Schwan's, Inc.

757 N.W.2d 179, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 618, 2008 WL 4810796

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 29, 2008·No. A08-1258, A08-1260·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these appeals are consolidated for purposes of consideration.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 1, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees (A08-1258).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these appeals are consolidated for purposes of consideration.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 1, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees (A08-1258).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Rubertus v. Schwan's, Inc., 757 N.W.2d 179, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 618, 2008 WL 4810796 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

757 N.W.2d 179 (Rubertus v. Schwan's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related