Rubertus v. Schwan's, Inc.

757 N.W.2d 179, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 618, 2008 WL 4810796
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 29, 2008
DocketA08-1258, A08-1260
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 757 N.W.2d 179 (Rubertus v. Schwan's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rubertus v. Schwan's, Inc., 757 N.W.2d 179, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 618, 2008 WL 4810796 (Mich. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these appeals are consolidated for purposes of consideration.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 1, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees (A08-1258).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Williams
757 N.W.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
757 N.W.2d 179, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 618, 2008 WL 4810796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubertus-v-schwans-inc-minn-2008.