Rubenstein v. Rubenstein
This text of 76 N.E.2d 157 (Rubenstein v. Rubenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree affirmed. From a decree of the Probate Court dismissing his libel for divorce brought on the ground of cruel and abusive treatment, the libellant appeals. The libel was uncontested. The judge made no findings of fact but there is a report of the evidence. The evidence need not be recited. We assume that the libellant’s testimony, although uncorroborated, was sufficient to warrant a decree in his favor. See Goren v. Goren, 310 Mass. 284. But such a decree was not required. The judge was not obliged to believe the testimony of the libellant even though it was uncontradicted. Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven A Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323. Reardon Importing Co. v. Security Trust Co. 318 Mass. 304, 307, and cases cited. The record reveals no error of law or fact.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 N.E.2d 157, 321 Mass. 751, 1947 Mass. LEXIS 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubenstein-v-rubenstein-mass-1947.