Rubenfeld v. Gambino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rubenfeld v. Gambino

289 A.D.2d 319, 734 N.Y.S.2d 488, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11964

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 319 (Rubenfeld v. Gambino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rubenfeld v. Gambino, 289 A.D.2d 319, 734 N.Y.S.2d 488, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action pursuant to CPLR [320]*3203213 for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated July 27, 1999, as, upon an order of the same court dated July 19, 1999, granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss the defendant’s second counterclaim, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $25,129.50.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss the defendant’s second counterclaim alleging that the plaintiff violated Judiciary Law § 487. The defendant’s contention that the plaintiff made misrepresentations in his appellate brief was rejected by this Court in its order dated June 25, 1996, denying the defendant’s motion for reargument. Accordingly, that determination is the law of the case (see, Gettner v Getty Oil Co., 285 AD2d 528, lv dismissed 97 NY2d 634; Thomas v Dietrick, 284 AD2d 325; Kowalski Enters. v Sem Intl., 278 AD2d 371). S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action pursuant to CPLR [320]*3203213 for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated July 27, 1999, as, upon an order of the same court dated July 19, 1999, granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss the defendant’s second counterclaim, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $25,129.50.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss the defendant’s second counterclaim alleging that the plaintiff violated Judiciary Law § 487. The defendant’s contention that the plaintiff made misrepresentations in his appellate brief was rejected by this Court in its order dated June 25, 1996, denying the defendant’s motion for reargument. Accordingly, that determination is the law of the case (see, Gettner v Getty Oil Co., 285 AD2d 528, lv dismissed 97 NY2d 634; Thomas v Dietrick, 284 AD2d 325; Kowalski Enters. v Sem Intl., 278 AD2d 371). S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 319, 734 N.Y.S.2d 488, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubenfeld-v-gambino-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack