Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 30, 2020
Docket03-20-00128-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State (Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00128-CR

Ruben Ortiz Haro, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. B-17-1174-SB, THE HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 10, 2020. After this Court granted

multiple motions requesting an extension of time to file his brief, the Court ordered counsel to

file appellant’s brief no later than August 31, 2020. In granting the most recent extension, this

Court advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted and that a failure to file

appellant’s brief would result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule

38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. After the Court issued its order, appellant’s

counsel filed a subsequent motion seeking a further extension to September 5, 2020. To date, the

brief has not been tendered for filing.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct

a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make

appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the

court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal.

Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared

and forwarded to this Court no later than October 30, 2020. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered September 30, 2020.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly

Abated and Remanded

Filed: September 30, 2020

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-ortiz-haro-v-state-texapp-2020.