Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State
This text of Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State (Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-20-00128-CR
Ruben Ortiz Haro, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. B-17-1174-SB, THE HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 10, 2020. After this Court granted
multiple motions requesting an extension of time to file his brief, the Court ordered counsel to
file appellant’s brief no later than August 31, 2020. In granting the most recent extension, this
Court advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted and that a failure to file
appellant’s brief would result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule
38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. After the Court issued its order, appellant’s
counsel filed a subsequent motion seeking a further extension to September 5, 2020. To date, the
brief has not been tendered for filing.
The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct
a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make
appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the
court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal.
Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate
supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared
and forwarded to this Court no later than October 30, 2020. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).
It is so ordered September 30, 2020.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly
Abated and Remanded
Filed: September 30, 2020
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruben Ortiz Haro v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-ortiz-haro-v-state-texapp-2020.