Ruben Joe Ramirez v. State
This text of Ruben Joe Ramirez v. State (Ruben Joe Ramirez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-04-00919-CR
Ruben Joe RAMIREZ,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the County Court at Law, Medina County, Texas
Trial Court No. 20576
Honorable Vivian Torres, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 18, 2005
DISMISSED
Ruben Joe Ramirez appeals the trial court’s December 5, 2004, judgment. The record was due April 4, 2005, 120 days after the date sentence was imposed or suspended. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.2(b). On April 4, 2005, the Medina County Clerk filed a notification stating the clerk’s record had not been filed because Ramirez had not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. Accordingly, on April 13, 2005, we ordered Ramirez to provide written proof to this court on or before April 28, 2005, that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) he is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We cautioned Ramirez that if he failed to respond within the time provided, his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Ramirez has not filed a response and the clerk’s record has not been filed.
We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruben Joe Ramirez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-joe-ramirez-v-state-texapp-2005.