Ruben James Carter v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 29, 2003
Docket06-02-00179-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ruben James Carter v. State (Ruben James Carter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruben James Carter v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________



No. 06-02-00179-CR



RUBEN JAMES CARTER, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 182nd Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 903441





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Ruben Carter appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, namely codeine. Carter was tried before a jury and the judge sentenced him to twenty years' imprisonment. This is a companion to another appeal also decided this day, in appeal number 06-02-00178-CR. Both convictions occurred in the same proceeding and were based on the same incident. The briefs and arguments raised therein are identical in both cases. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our opinion in 06-02-00178-CR, we likewise affirm the judgment in this case.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.



Jack Carter

Justice



Date Submitted: May 14, 2003

Date Decided: September 29, 2003



Do Not Publish

style="text-align: justify; line-height: 0.416667in">          Appellant Titus Regional Medical Center and Appellee Nellie Bell, acting as representative of the estate of George Traylor, have presented this Court with a joint motion to dismiss the pending appeal in this matter. The trial court denied Titus' plea to the jurisdiction, and Titus perfected the instant interlocutory appeal. The parties now represent to this Court they have reached a "full and final settlement." In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal is moot.

          We remand this cause to the trial court for entry of orders to effectuate the settlement agreement among the parties. We dismiss the instant appeal.


                                                                           Donald R. Ross


Date Submitted:      January 3, 2006

Date Decided:         January 4, 2006


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ruben James Carter v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-james-carter-v-state-texapp-2003.