Ruben Gonzalez-Machuca v. Loretta Lynch
This text of 668 F. App'x 501 (Ruben Gonzalez-Machuca v. Loretta Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ruben Gonzalez-Machuca, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) order finding that he abandoned his application for cancellation of removal. After thoroughly reviewing the record and considering Gonzalez-Machuca’s arguments, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion by agreeing with the IJ that Gonzalez-Machu-ca abandoned his application for cancellation of removal. See Yanez-Marquez v. Lynch, 789 F.3d 434, 444 (4th Cir. 2015) (applying an abuse of discretion standard to review of BIA decisions); Moreta v. Holder, 723 F.3d 31, 34 (1st Cir. 2013) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Gonzalez-Machuca, (B.I.A. Nov. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-gonzalez-machuca-v-loretta-lynch-ca4-2016.