Ruben Esqueda v. Kathy Jo Esqueda
This text of Ruben Esqueda v. Kathy Jo Esqueda (Ruben Esqueda v. Kathy Jo Esqueda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
RUBEN ESQUEDA, APPELLANT,
KATHY JO ESQUEDA, APPELLEE.
_____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant's brief in the above cause was due on December 17, 2007. On February 6, 2008, the Court notified appellant, who is proceeding pro se, that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant reasonably explained his failure to file the brief and the appellee was not significantly injured by his failure to timely file the brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c). Appellant's response, filed with this Court on February 15, 2008, fails to provide a reasonable explanation for his failure to file the brief and further fails to request an extension of time for said filing. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See id.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam delivered
and filed this the 13th day of March, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruben Esqueda v. Kathy Jo Esqueda, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-esqueda-v-kathy-jo-esqueda-texapp-2008.