Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.. Read the opinion of the Court — 747 F.3d 773 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2013·No. 08-70836·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBEN ADOLFO CERON, AKA No. 08-70836 Ruben Ceron-Casco, Petitioner, Agency No. A073-969-493 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.

Filed September 19, 2013

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBEN ADOLFO CERON, AKA No. 08-70836 Ruben Ceron-Casco, Petitioner, Agency No. A073-969-493 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.

Filed September 19, 2013

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr., (9th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr. (Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.