Ruben C. Gomez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 16, 2019
Docket01-18-00864-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ruben C. Gomez v. State (Ruben C. Gomez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruben C. Gomez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ruben C. Gomez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00864-CR

Trial court case number: 1564007

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

Appellant and the State have filed a joint motion to abate, seeking a remand to the trial court for preparation of findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. The reporter’s record contains the hearing and ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress. Appellant requested findings and conclusions on the record after the trial court stated its rulings and the trial court agreed to prepare them, but none are included in the clerk’s record. The motion is GRANTED. The appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of written findings of fact and conclusions of law, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations in this case, in conjunction with the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motions to suppress. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that trial court must provide findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide appellate court with basis to review trial court’s application of law to facts, either in writing or on record at hearing); Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. The trial court shall cause the filing of a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law within 45 days of the date of this order. Appellant’s amended brief, if he chooses to file one, will be due 30 days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this Court. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___Justice Peter Kelly_______________________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _May 16, 2019_____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Wicker v. State
740 S.W.2d 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ruben C. Gomez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-c-gomez-v-state-texapp-2019.