Ruben Arce v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 3, 2013·No. 04-12-00540-CR·Published

Opinion

jfourtl) Court of %>m Sutonia,

October 3. 2013

No. 04-12-G0540-CR

Ruben Arce. Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 2012CRM000033-D2

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid ii in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX- R. APP. P. 39.8, Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on November 6, 2013, to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone, Justice Barnard, and Justice Alvarez. All parlies will be notified of the Court's deeision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. Al'i\ I1. 4S.

Hither party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination thai oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. API'. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ien(10) days from the dale of this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2013.

Catherine/Stone, Chief justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF have hereunto my hand and affixed the seal o/thc said court on this October 3.2013.

ii a.- 50/ ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruben Arce v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Ruben Arce v. State (Ruben Arce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.