Rubelman v. Rubelman
602 So. 2d 985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8119, 1992 WL 167612
Opinion
Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Zalis v. Zalis, 498 So.2d 505 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Schein v. Schein, 448 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Koeppel v. Koeppel, 351 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rubelman v. Rubelman, 602 So. 2d 985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8119, 1992 WL 167612 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
602 So. 2d 985 (Rubelman v. Rubelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schein v. Schein
448 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Koeppel v. Koeppel
351 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Zalis v. Zalis
498 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)