Rubelman v. Rubelman

602 So. 2d 985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8119, 1992 WL 167612
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 21, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2733
StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 985 (Rubelman v. Rubelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rubelman v. Rubelman, 602 So. 2d 985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8119, 1992 WL 167612 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Zalis v. Zalis, 498 So.2d 505 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Schein v. Schein, 448 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Koeppel v. Koeppel, 351 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schein v. Schein
448 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Koeppel v. Koeppel
351 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Zalis v. Zalis
498 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 So. 2d 985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8119, 1992 WL 167612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubelman-v-rubelman-fladistctapp-1992.