Rubel v. Rubel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rubel v. Rubel Corp.

3 A.D.2d 837, 161 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6002

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 837 (Rubel v. Rubel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rubel v. Rubel Corp., 3 A.D.2d 837, 161 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a stockholder of a Delaware corporation against a New York corporation into which the Delaware corporation was merged, to be declared a stockholder of the New York corporation, to compel the issuance of stock in such corporation to him, and for other relief, the appeal is from so much of an order as granted a motion to strike certain paragraphs from the complaint and as directed appellant to serve an amended complaint making more definite and certain his position with respect to the validity of the merger. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a stockholder of a Delaware corporation against a New York corporation into which the Delaware corporation was merged, to be declared a stockholder of the New York corporation, to compel the issuance of stock in such corporation to him, and for other relief, the appeal is from so much of an order as granted a motion to strike certain paragraphs from the complaint and as directed appellant to serve an amended complaint making more definite and certain his position with respect to the validity of the merger. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 837, 161 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubel-v-rubel-corp-nyappdiv-1957.