Rubel Corp. v. Hinds

234 A.D. 724

This text of 234 A.D. 724 (Rubel Corp. v. Hinds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rubel Corp. v. Hinds, 234 A.D. 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order granting injunction pendente lite as against defendant [725]*725Hinds affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Order granting injunction pendente lite as against defendant Jersey Meadow-Gold Co., Inc., reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied upon the ground that the record does not establish a willful interference with the contract made between the plaintiff and defendant Hinds. We refrain from further expression upon the merits as to both defendants, leaving it to the trial court to determine the rights of the parties according to the facts upon findings of fact and law. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubel-corp-v-hinds-nyappdiv-1931.