Rubel Corp. v. Frank Tursellino & Co.

263 A.D. 948, 33 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7530

This text of 263 A.D. 948 (Rubel Corp. v. Frank Tursellino & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rubel Corp. v. Frank Tursellino & Co., 263 A.D. 948, 33 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents on the ground that the action being one by a vendee for specific performance of an agreement to sell all the real and personal property of a corporate vendor the plaintifi is required to allege in its complaint that the consent required under section 20 of the Stock Corporation Law had been secured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 948, 33 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubel-corp-v-frank-tursellino-co-nyappdiv-1942.