Rubber & Celluloid Harness Trimming Co. v. Rubber-Bound Brush Co.
88 A. 210, 81 N.J. Eq. 519, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 344
This text of 88 A. 210 (Rubber & Celluloid Harness Trimming Co. v. Rubber-Bound Brush Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rubber & Celluloid Harness Trimming Co. v. Rubber-Bound Brush Co., 88 A. 210, 81 N.J. Eq. 519, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 344 (N.J. 1913).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chan-' cellor Howell.
[520]*520For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, White, Heppenheimer, Terhune — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pharmacia Corp. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
201 F. Supp. 2d 335 (D. New Jersey, 2002)
Morgenstern Chemical Company, Inc. v. G. D. Searle & Company
253 F.2d 390 (Third Circuit, 1958)
American Shops, Inc. v. AM. FASHION, & C., INC.
80 A.2d 575 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Weiss v. the Stork Gift Shop
45 A.2d 688 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Bernstein v. Friedman
160 P.2d 227 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1945)
George W. Luft Co. v. Zande Cosmetic Co.
48 F. Supp. 602 (S.D. New York, 1942)
Rubber & Celluloid Harness Trimming Co. v. F. W. Devoe & C. T. Reynolds Co.
233 F. 150 (D. New Jersey, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 A. 210, 81 N.J. Eq. 519, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubber-celluloid-harness-trimming-co-v-rubber-bound-brush-co-nj-1913.