Rubalcaba v. State
This text of 706 So. 2d 1380 (Rubalcaba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm the trial court’s order that grants in part, and denies in part, defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence. However, we remand with directions to the trial court to correct the two typographical errors in the order on appeal as follows. On page one of the order, what appears in the last line as “Count IV” shall be corrected to read “Count VI.” On page two of the order, on the first line, Roman Numeral “II” shall be corrected to read Roman Numeral “HI.”
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 So. 2d 1380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2931, 1998 WL 131285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubalcaba-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.