Rubalcaba v. State
706 So. 2d 1380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2931, 1998 WL 131285
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1998·No. No. 97-2966·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
We affirm the trial court’s order that grants in part, and denies in part, defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence. However, we remand with directions to the trial court to correct the two typographical errors in the order on appeal as follows. On page one of the order, what appears in the last line as “Count IV” shall be corrected to read “Count VI.” On page two of the order, on the first line, Roman Numeral “II” shall be corrected to read Roman Numeral “HI.”
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rubalcaba v. State, 706 So. 2d 1380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2931, 1998 WL 131285 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
706 So. 2d 1380 (Rubalcaba v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rubalcaba v. State
729 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)