R.T.D. v. State

679 So. 2d 1263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1996 WL 526260
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 1996
DocketNo. 94-04120
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 679 So. 2d 1263 (R.T.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.T.D. v. State, 679 So. 2d 1263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1996 WL 526260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order adjudicating R.T.D. delinquent and the disposition of that adjudication. We strike the imposition of $50 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund and $75 as a public defender fee because the trial court did not cite any statutory authority for these costs in its order. If, on remand, the trial court reimposes these costs, it must cite the specific statutes authorizing the costs. Williams v. State, 661 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed as modified, and remanded with instructions.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shahzad Nazir Sayed v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Brien Austin Kim v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
GRACE ANN KING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
I.B. v. State
806 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 So. 2d 1263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1996 WL 526260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rtd-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.