R.T.D. v. State
This text of 679 So. 2d 1263 (R.T.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the order adjudicating R.T.D. delinquent and the disposition of that adjudication. We strike the imposition of $50 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund and $75 as a public defender fee because the trial court did not cite any statutory authority for these costs in its order. If, on remand, the trial court reimposes these costs, it must cite the specific statutes authorizing the costs. Williams v. State, 661 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Affirmed as modified, and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
679 So. 2d 1263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1996 WL 526260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rtd-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.