R.T.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.T.D. v. State

679 So. 2d 1263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1996 WL 526260

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1996·No. No. 94-04120·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order adjudicating R.T.D. delinquent and the disposition of that adjudication. We strike the imposition of $50 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund and $75 as a public defender fee because the trial court did not cite any statutory authority for these costs in its order. If, on remand, the trial court reimposes these costs, it must cite the specific statutes authorizing the costs. Williams v. State, 661 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed as modified, and remanded with instructions.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order adjudicating R.T.D. delinquent and the disposition of that adjudication. We strike the imposition of $50 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund and $75 as a public defender fee because the trial court did not cite any statutory authority for these costs in its order. If, on remand, the trial court reimposes these costs, it must cite the specific statutes authorizing the costs. Williams v. State, 661 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed as modified, and remanded with instructions.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

R.T.D. v. State, 679 So. 2d 1263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784, 1996 WL 526260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

679 So. 2d 1263 (R.T.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related