RTC Mortgage Trust 1995-S/N1 v. R&C General Contractors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

RTC Mortgage Trust 1995-S/N1 v. R&C General Contractors Corp.

299 A.D.2d 468, 749 N.Y.S.2d 740

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 2002·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants R&C General Contractors Corp., Carmine Gargano, and Rose Gargano appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated July 27, 2000, as, upon, sua sponte, recalling and vacating stated portions of a prior order dated October 21, 1999, continued in full force and effect so much of that order as denied their motion to set aside a foreclosure sale and granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to confirm the referee’s report of sale.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, with costs.

[469]*469The appeal must be dismissed as the order appealed from did not determine a motion made on notice and leave to appeal has not been granted (see CPLR 5701). In any event, we note that the appellants improperly seek to obtain review of the prior order dated October 21, 1999, by way of this appeal. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants R&C General Contractors Corp., Carmine Gargano, and Rose Gargano appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated July 27, 2000, as, upon, sua sponte, recalling and vacating stated portions of a prior order dated October 21, 1999, continued in full force and effect so much of that order as denied their motion to set aside a foreclosure sale and granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to confirm the referee’s report of sale.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, with costs.

[469]*469The appeal must be dismissed as the order appealed from did not determine a motion made on notice and leave to appeal has not been granted (see CPLR 5701). In any event, we note that the appellants improperly seek to obtain review of the prior order dated October 21, 1999, by way of this appeal. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

RTC Mortgage Trust 1995-S/N1 v. R&C General Contractors Corp., 299 A.D.2d 468, 749 N.Y.S.2d 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

299 A.D.2d 468 (RTC Mortgage Trust 1995-S/N1 v. R&C General Contractors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.