R.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.T. v. State

879 So. 2d 1257, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11716, 2004 WL 1779125

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 11, 2004

DocketNo. 3D03-2464

StatusPublished

This text of 879 So. 2d 1257 (R.T. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.T. v. State, 879 So. 2d 1257, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11716, 2004 WL 1779125 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

R.T. appeals a determination that he committed the offense of burglary, after which the trial court withheld adjudication. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient. See Diaz v. State, 845 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Lopez v. State, 811 So.2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); C.C. v. State, 823 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); State v. Dawson, 681 So.2d 1206, 1207 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also § 810.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2003).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

R.T. appeals a determination that he committed the offense of burglary, after which the trial court withheld adjudication. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient. See Diaz v. State, 845 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Lopez v. State, 811 So.2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); C.C. v. State, 823 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); State v. Dawson, 681 So.2d 1206, 1207 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also § 810.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2003).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

879 So. 2d 1257, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11716, 2004 WL 1779125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rt-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack