R.T. v. State
879 So. 2d 1257, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11716, 2004 WL 1779125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R.T. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 83 →
Opinion
R.T. appeals a determination that he committed the offense of burglary, after which the trial court withheld adjudication. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient. See Diaz v. State, 845 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Lopez v. State, 811 So.2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); C.C. v. State, 823 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); State v. Dawson, 681 So.2d 1206, 1207 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also § 810.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2003).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R.T. v. State, 879 So. 2d 1257, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11716, 2004 WL 1779125 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
879 So. 2d 1257 (R.T. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Dawson
681 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Diaz v. State
845 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Lopez v. State of Florida
811 So. 2d 839 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
C.C. v. State
823 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)