RSO Corporation v. Navistar Inc.
This text of RSO Corporation v. Navistar Inc. (RSO Corporation v. Navistar Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 RSO CORPORATION, Case No. 2:23-cv-01669-JAD-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), Order v. [Docket No. 58] NAVISTAR, INC., 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is a motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff. Docket No. 58; see also Docket No. 59 (errata to certificate of service). No response was filed. For good cause 13] shown, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to update 14] the docket with the contact information for Plaintiff provided at Docket No. 59. In addition, Plaintiff must retain licensed counsel by July 18, 2025. United States v. High Country Broad. Co., 16] 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993). Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: June 27, 2025
Nancy J. Koppe 20 United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RSO Corporation v. Navistar Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rso-corporation-v-navistar-inc-nvd-2025.