RSM Inc. v. Middleton

Hawaii Supreme Court

RSM Inc. v. Middleton

DecidedAugust 19, 2020

DocketSCWC-19-0000406

StatusPublished

This text of RSM Inc. v. Middleton (RSM Inc. v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RSM Inc. v. Middleton, (haw 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 19-AUG-2020 11:49 AM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

RSM, INC., Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

WILLIAM MIDDLETON and TATIANA MIDDLETON, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 3RC 17-1-000320)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ashford, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants William Middleton and Tatiana Middleton’s application for writ of certiorari filed on June 19, 2020, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 19, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ James H. Ashford

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI