Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz

R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz

264 So. 3d 1052
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13455 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 2019·No. No. 3D17-2607·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*1053On the specific record before us, we agree with the trial court that Appellees withdrew from the underlying case leaving adequate time for replacement counsel to meet the applicable trial and appellate deadlines. Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 616 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) ; Maillard v. Dowdell, 528 So.2d 512, 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ; Frazier v. Effman, 501 So.2d 114, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz, 264 So. 3d 1052 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

264 So. 3d 1052 (R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frazier v. Effman
501 So. 2d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Maillard v. Dowdell
528 So. 2d 512 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, PA
616 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)