R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz

264 So. 3d 1052
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 2019
DocketNo. 3D17-2607
StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 1052 (R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. Berlowitz, 264 So. 3d 1052 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*1053On the specific record before us, we agree with the trial court that Appellees withdrew from the underlying case leaving adequate time for replacement counsel to meet the applicable trial and appellate deadlines. Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 616 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) ; Maillard v. Dowdell, 528 So.2d 512, 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ; Frazier v. Effman, 501 So.2d 114, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frazier v. Effman
501 So. 2d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Maillard v. Dowdell
528 So. 2d 512 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, PA
616 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 So. 3d 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rsb-ventures-inc-v-berlowitz-fladistctapp-2019.