R.S.B. v. State

632 So. 2d 29, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 1041, 1993 WL 408200
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 15, 1993·No. 1921499·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice.

We note that although the state stipulated that R.S.B. was not in need of care or rehabilitation, there was sufficient evidence from which the trial court could have determined that, because of the commission of the offenses with which he was charged, R.S.B. was, in fact, in need of care or rehabilitation.

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.S.B. v. State, 632 So. 2d 29, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 1041, 1993 WL 408200 (Ala. 1993).

632 So. 2d 29 (R.S.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.S.B. v. State
632 So. 2d 29 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)