R.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.S. v. State

537 So. 2d 682, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 259, 1989 WL 4189

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1989

DocketNo. 87-1477

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 So. 2d 682 (R.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.S. v. State, 537 So. 2d 682, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 259, 1989 WL 4189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found delinquent on two counts, first, burglary of an auto, and second, grand theft of an auto. We sustain the delinquency finding as to count one, but we strike the delinquency finding as to count two for a lack of sufficient evidence. Therefore the adjudication of delinquency as to count one is affirmed and the adjudication of delinquency is hereby stricken as to count two. As modified the adjudication is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found delinquent on two counts, first, burglary of an auto, and second, grand theft of an auto. We sustain the delinquency finding as to count one, but we strike the delinquency finding as to count two for a lack of sufficient evidence. Therefore the adjudication of delinquency as to count one is affirmed and the adjudication of delinquency is hereby stricken as to count two. As modified the adjudication is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 682, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 259, 1989 WL 4189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rs-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack