R.S., Individually and R.S. as Next Friend of P.S. v. T.S.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 16, 2020·No. 02-19-00278-CV·Published

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00278-CV

R.S., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR P.S., Appellant V.

T.S., Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2018-00778

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On November 18, 2019, we notified Appellant that his brief had not been filed as required. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant filed his brief with the court no later than December 9, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 44.3. We have received no response.

Because Appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 16, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.S., Individually and R.S. as Next Friend of P.S. v. T.S., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

R.S., Individually and R.S. as Next Friend of P.S. v. T.S. (R.S., Individually and R.S. as Next Friend of P.S. v. T.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.