R.S., Individually and R.S. as Next Friend of P.S. v. T.S.
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-19-00278-CV
R.S., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR P.S., Appellant V.
T.S., Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas
Trial Court No. CV-2018-00778
Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On November 18, 2019, we notified Appellant that his brief had not been filed as required. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant filed his brief with the court no later than December 9, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 44.3. We have received no response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: January 16, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R.S., Individually and R.S. as Next Friend of P.S. v. T.S. (R.S., Individually and R.S. as Next Friend of P.S. v. T.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.