RRK v. State
904 So. 2d 661, 2005 WL 1538092
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in RRK v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10140 →
Opinion
R.R.K., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm this case based on V.K.E. v. State, 902 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). As in that case, we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court.
DOES A TRIAL JUDGE HAVE THE POWER AND AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE ON JUVENILES IN A JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING, THE MANDATORY SURCHARGES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 938.08 AND 930.085?
AFFIRMED; Question CERTIFIED.
SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. *662
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
RRK v. State, 904 So. 2d 661, 2005 WL 1538092 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
904 So. 2d 661 (RRK v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
V.K.E. v. State
902 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
R.R.K. v. State
904 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)