R.R.H. v. M.C.S.

Missouri Court of Appeals

R.R.H. v. M.C.S.

533 S.W.3d 801

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104948

StatusPublished

This text of 533 S.W.3d 801 (R.R.H. v. M.C.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.R.H. v. M.C.S., 533 S.W.3d 801 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

M.C.S. appeals from the judgment of the circuit court granting a Full Order of Protection against him in favor of R.R.H., Sr. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

M.C.S. appeals from the judgment of the circuit court granting a Full Order of Protection against him in favor of R.R.H., Sr. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

533 S.W.3d 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rrh-v-mcs-moctapp-2017.