Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.R. v. State

R.R. v. State

117 So. 3d 806, 2013 WL 3014147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9602
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R.R. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5154 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 2013·No. No. 4D12-3728·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See P.W.G. v. State, 702 So.2d 488, 490-91 (Fla.1997) (juvenile court did not violate juvenile’s substantive due process rights in considering uncharged criminal activity in placement decision, given the differing goals of the juvenile delinquency and adult criminal systems).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.R. v. State, 117 So. 3d 806, 2013 WL 3014147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9602 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

117 So. 3d 806 (R.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

P.W.G. v. State
702 So. 2d 488 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)