Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.R. v. State

R.R. v. State

117 So. 3d 806, 2013 WL 3014147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9602
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 2013
DocketNo. 4D12-3728
StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 3d 806 (R.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.R. v. State, 117 So. 3d 806, 2013 WL 3014147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9602 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See P.W.G. v. State, 702 So.2d 488, 490-91 (Fla.1997) (juvenile court did not violate juvenile’s substantive due process rights in considering uncharged criminal activity in placement decision, given the differing goals of the juvenile delinquency and adult criminal systems).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

P.W.G. v. State
702 So. 2d 488 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 3d 806, 2013 WL 3014147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rr-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.