Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/RR v. State

RR v. State

933 So. 2d 655, 2006 WL 1816255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in RR v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1273 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 2006·No. 4D05-4689·Published

Opinion

933 So.2d 655 (2006)

R.R., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-4689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 5, 2006.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and John Pauly, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000).

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RR v. State, 933 So. 2d 655, 2006 WL 1816255 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

933 So. 2d 655 (RR v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddox v. State
760 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)