Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.R. v. State

R.R. v. State

844 So. 2d 703, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6209, 2003 WL 2003278
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2003·No. No. 2D02-3224·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right R.R. might have to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court. See State v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 213 (Fla.2001); J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.R. v. State, 844 So. 2d 703, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6209, 2003 WL 2003278 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

844 So. 2d 703 (R.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCabe v. State
844 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)