Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.R. v. State

R.R. v. State

844 So. 2d 703, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6209, 2003 WL 2003278
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2003
DocketNo. 2D02-3224
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 844 So. 2d 703 (R.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.R. v. State, 844 So. 2d 703, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6209, 2003 WL 2003278 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right R.R. might have to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court. See State v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 213 (Fla.2001); J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCabe v. State
844 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
844 So. 2d 703, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6209, 2003 WL 2003278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rr-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.