R&R Serv. v. Ohio Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd.

Ohio Supreme Court

R&R Serv. v. Ohio Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd.

719 N.E.2d 5, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1442, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3559

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 10, 1999

Docket99-1780

StatusPublished

This text of 719 N.E.2d 5 (R&R Serv. v. Ohio Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R&R Serv. v. Ohio Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd., 719 N.E.2d 5, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1442, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3559 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Sandusky App. No. S-99-003. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 12 of the court of appeals’ Opinion and Judgment Entry journalized September 3,1999:

“[T]his court finds that our judgment in the instant appeal is in conflict with Amoco Oil Co. v. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Compensation Release Bd. (June 30, 1999), Montgomery App. No. 17672, unreported [1999 WL 961243], on the issue of whether Ohio Adm.Code 3737-1-07(A)(1) is an invalid rule. Consequently, we hereby certify the record in this case to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and final determination of the conflict presented pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution, and App.R. 25.”

This cause is consolidated with 99-1481, infra.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents to the above. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandusky App. No. S-99-003. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 12 of the court of appeals’ Opinion and Judgment Entry journalized September 3,1999:

“[T]his court finds that our judgment in the instant appeal is in conflict with Amoco Oil Co. v. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Compensation Release Bd. (June 30, 1999), Montgomery App. No. 17672, unreported [1999 WL 961243], on the issue of whether Ohio Adm.Code 3737-1-07(A)(1) is an invalid rule. Consequently, we hereby certify the record in this case to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and final determination of the conflict presented pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution, and App.R. 25.”

This cause is consolidated with 99-1481, infra.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents to the above. Resnick, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 N.E.2d 5, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1442, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rr-serv-v-ohio-petroleum-underground-storage-tank-release-comp-bd-ohio-1999.