Rptz-Patco, Inc. v. Pacific Inland Navigation Company, Inc.
This text of 377 F.2d 558 (Rptz-Patco, Inc. v. Pacific Inland Navigation Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
377 F.2d 558
RPTZ-PATCO, INC., Appellant,
v.
PACIFIC INLAND NAVIGATION COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.
No. 21105.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 3, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; John F. Kilkenny, Judge.
John R. Gilbertson, White, Sutherland & Gilbertson, Portland, Or., James M. Naylor, John K. Uilkema, Naylor & Neal, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
John Gordon Gearin, McColloch, Dezendorf & Spears, Portland, Or., W. Melville Van Sciver, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The decree entered by the district court from which the appeal and cross-appeal were taken is affirmed for the reasons and upon the grounds stated in the opinion of the district court, reported at 253 F.Supp. 796 (D.Or., 1966).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
377 F.2d 558, 154 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 464, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rptz-patco-inc-v-pacific-inland-navigation-company-ca9-1967.