R.P. Brennan General Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. CPS 1 Realty, LP

63 A.D.3d 619, 880 N.Y.S.2d 490

This text of 63 A.D.3d 619 (R.P. Brennan General Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. CPS 1 Realty, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.P. Brennan General Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. CPS 1 Realty, LP, 63 A.D.3d 619, 880 N.Y.S.2d 490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered on or about December 18, 2008, which, inter alia, directed a hearing to determine whether plaintiff contractor had substantially completed its work, and order, same court and Justice, entered November 24, 2008, which, to the extent appealable, clarified that issues to be determined at the hearing would include the amount of retainage, if any, that should be released, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the direction for a hearing vacated.

The gravamen of the relief sought was the payment of damages, rendering specific performance an inappropriate remedy (see Sokoloff v Harriman Estates Dev. Corp., 96 NY2d 409, 415 [2001]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Nardelli, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.
754 N.E.2d 184 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.3d 619, 880 N.Y.S.2d 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rp-brennan-general-contractors-builders-inc-v-cps-1-realty-lp-nyappdiv-2009.