Rozzo v. Frero Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rozzo v. Frero Realty Co.

252 A.D. 849, 300 N.Y.S. 1001, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6496

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 849 (Rozzo v. Frero Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rozzo v. Frero Realty Co., 252 A.D. 849, 300 N.Y.S. 1001, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

As it appears that the Special Term has indicated that the appellant may renew the motion to punish for contempt upon the completion of the examination of Anthony Freda, we see no reason to interfere with the exercise of the court’s discretion at this time. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present —■ Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As it appears that the Special Term has indicated that the appellant may renew the motion to punish for contempt upon the completion of the examination of Anthony Freda, we see no reason to interfere with the exercise of the court’s discretion at this time. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present —■ Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 849, 300 N.Y.S. 1001, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozzo-v-frero-realty-co-nyappdiv-1937.