Rozzelle v. University of North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Rozzelle v. University of North Carolina

646 F. App'x 336

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2016·No. No. 15-2564·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dardrie Rozzelle appeals the district court’s order denying her postjudgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rozzelle v. Univ. of N.C., No. 3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dardrie Rozzelle appeals the district court’s order denying her postjudgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rozzelle v. Univ. of N.C., No. 3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rozzelle v. University of North Carolina, 646 F. App'x 336 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

646 F. App'x 336 (Rozzelle v. University of North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related