Rozo v. Ancona

2020 NY Slip Op 35558
CourtNew York Supreme Court, Bronx County
DecidedSeptember 28, 2020
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 35558 (Rozo v. Ancona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, Bronx County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rozo v. Ancona, 2020 NY Slip Op 35558 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

Rozo v Ancona 2020 NY Slip Op 35558(U) September 28, 2020 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: Index No. 26486/19E Judge: Ben R. Barbato Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/13/2020 03:28 PM INDEX NO. 26486/2019E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2020

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX TRIAL TERM- PART 14

Present: Honorable Ben R. Barbato

ANGIE BERNAL ROZO and ALIXON TRINIDAD,

DECISION/O RDER Plaintiff, Index No.: 26486/l 9E -against-

ROGER ANCONA, RISHAD MUBARAK and HESHANTHA EKANA YAKAMUDIYANSELAGE,

Defendant.

Recitation, as required by CPLR 2219(a) of the papers considered in the review of this motion to dismiss:

Papers Numbered Notice of Motion, Affirmation and Exhibits Annexed 1 Notice of Cross-Motion, Affirmation and Exhibits Annexed 2 Affirmation in Opposition and Exhibit Annexed 3 A01rmation in Opposition to Cross-Motio n and Exhibits 4 Affirmation in Reply 5

The instant action sounds in personal injury arising from a motor vehicle accident

occurring on September 9, 2017, on that roadway known as the Queens Midtown Tunnel, in the

County of the Queens, City and State ofNew York. Defendarit, Roger Ancona, moves this court

for an Order pursuant to CPLR §3212 awarding Summary Judgment dismissing the Plaintiff's

Complaint with prejudice on the issue of liability. By Notice of Cross-Motion, Plaintiffs, Angie

Bernal Rozo and Alixon Trinidad, move this court for an Order granting summary judgment on

the issue of liability as against the Defendants, Rishad Mubarak and Heshantha

Ekanayakamudiyanselage, and denying Defendant, Roger Acona' s motion for summary

judgment dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint and all cross-motions as against Defendant, Roger

2 of 4 [* 1] FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/13/2020 03:28 PM INDEX NO. 26486/2019E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2020

Ancona.

This case involves a rear end motor vehicle accident in which that vehicle operated by the

Defendant, Roger Ancona, was struck in the rear by the vehicle driven by Co-Defendant,

Heshantha Ekanayakamudiyanselage.

The law has been well established with respect to rear end collisions in cases where the

front vehicle is stopped or stopping. Here Defendant, Roger Ancona claims that his vehicle was

fully stopped in traffic in the Queens Midtown Tunnel when the Co-Defendants' vehicle struck

him in the rear. It is the duty of a operator of a motor vehicle to see what is there to be seen and

operate their vehicle according to the circumstances then and there existing. A driver of a motor

vehicle approaching another vehicle from the rear is bound to maintain a safe and reasonable

speed and control over their vehicle, exercising reasonable care to avoid colliding with the other

vehicle. In such instance if contact between the vehicle occurs it is prirna facie evidence of

negligence on the part of the driver of the rear vehicle which imposes a duty upon that operator to

come forward with a non-negligent explanation for the accident. Tutrani v. County of Suffolk, 10

NY3d 906, 908 (2008); Cabrera v. Rodriguez, 72 AD3d 533 (2010). In the instant case no non

negligent explanation has been tendered.

Plaintiff's argument that the instant motion is premature since the Defendant Roger

Ancona has not been deposed is unavailing. The presumption that further inquiry may yield

some evidence of comparative negligence of the part of the Defendant, Roger Ancona is

insufficient to overcome the presumption of negligence on the part of CO-Defendants, Rishad

Mubarak and Heshantha Ekanayakamudiyanselage.

ORDERED, that Defendant, Roger Ancona's motion for an Order pursuant to CPLR

§3212 granting summary judgment on the issue ofliability as against him and dismissing the

3 of 4 [* 2] FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/13/2020 03:28 PM INDEX NO. 26486/2019E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2020

Complaint and all counterclaims, granted it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiffs, Angie Bernal Rozo and Alixon Trinidad's, Cross-Motion for

an Order granting partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against the Defendants,

Rishad Mubarak and Heshantha Ekanayakamudiyanselageis granted.

Dated: September 28, 2020

Kon. Ben R. Barbato, J.S.C.

4 of 4 [* 3]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tutrani v. County of Suffolk
891 N.E.2d 726 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Hines
72 A.D.3d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 35558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozo-v-ancona-nysupctbrnx-2020.